Placeholder image of a protein
Icon representing a puzzle

397: Quest to the Native Design

Closed since over 11 years ago



February 02, 2011
Max points

This is the first Quest to the Native Design Puzzle. As mentioned in the blog ( we can identify an interaction between a disembodied sidechain and the protein surface and we then want to figure out a backbone conformation that can harbor that sidechain. This quest to the native is based on Puzzle 389: Design the Interface 5 (which you have seen in Gallery Mode). We want to see if this new disembodied sidechain representation (Trp 130) works well for you.

Top groups

  1. Avatar for Anthropic Dreams 100 pts. 9,740
  2. Avatar for Contenders 2. Contenders 83 pts. 9,737
  3. Avatar for Natural Abilities 3. Natural Abilities 69 pts. 9,706
  4. Avatar for Slovak National Team 4. Slovak National Team 56 pts. 9,681
  5. Avatar for Void Crushers 5. Void Crushers 45 pts. 9,679
  6. Avatar for Russian team 6. Russian team 36 pts. 9,679
  7. Avatar for Deleted group 7. Deleted group pts. 9,677
  8. Avatar for Deleted group 8. Deleted group pts. 9,670
  9. Avatar for SETI.Germany 9. SETI.Germany 18 pts. 9,660
  10. Avatar for Deleted group 10. Deleted group pts. 9,648

  1. Avatar for Mark-
    1. Mark- Lv 1
    100 pts. 9,737
  2. Avatar for Tony Origami 2. Tony Origami Lv 1 99 pts. 9,717
  3. Avatar for grabhorn 3. grabhorn Lv 1 97 pts. 9,711
  4. Avatar for Mr_Jolty 4. Mr_Jolty Lv 1 95 pts. 9,706
  5. Avatar for keypad5 6. keypad5 Lv 1 91 pts. 9,694
  6. Avatar for infjamc 7. infjamc Lv 1 89 pts. 9,693
  7. Avatar for PRL 8. PRL Lv 1 88 pts. 9,688
  8. Avatar for Merf 9. Merf Lv 1 86 pts. 9,686
  9. Avatar for Bletchley Park 10. Bletchley Park Lv 1 84 pts. 9,685


beta_helix Staff Lv 1

Please let us know what you think about the new disembodied sidechain representation. Thanks for your feedback!

Also note that this puzzle will close a day earlier than usual since it shouldn't take much time to work on.

spmm Lv 1

Having matched the guide and the sidechains which are unambiguous from the 'shadow' my score moved alarming lower even after rebuilds stabilising etc to improve it.
Having looked at a screen shot of a high scoring solution it is very different to the guide.
So why not just give us the formation shown in the guide and constraints to start with so we can improve from there.
My low score may of course be just my problem but closer to a 'guide' should reult in higher score or one just ignores the guides.
Bit confued by the intent.