Profile
Best ForComments
Sat, 09/21/2013 - 11:35
#2
Intel Core i3-2350M CPU @ 2.30 GHz 2.30 GHz
CPU time first loop: 13.232 sec Computer: Constructor: ICT Service desk
Sat, 09/21/2013 - 11:49
#3
Intel Core 2 Duo CPU @ 2.13 GHz
CPU time first loop: 32.9 sec Computer: Constructor: Apple
Sat, 09/21/2013 - 12:01
#4
What should you compare?
the CPU time first loop and the number of loops is the only pertinent results to be compared. Above, the old Mac took 19 loops. It is approximately 2.5 times less powerful than the (new) pc above. The points are only good for ranking: more point = more powerful computer, but 200 pts is not 2 times more powerful than 100 pts (the points depend on the zone of the protein used for the test). I used a very big protein in order to allow this test last for several years. I'll add other test results here. Please feel free to add results of other computers and configurations here. If you save and share your result, when you run the resipe on another computer, previous results are archived in note 1 (and also displayed in the log).
Sun, 09/22/2013 - 15:52
#5
Intel Core i7 CPU @ 2.9 GHz, 2 cores
CPU time first loop: 11.24 sec 3 clients running at the same time Computer: MacBook Pro (Mid 2012)
Sat, 02/18/2017 - 13:48
#6
Intel Core i7 CPU @ 2.9 GHz, 2 cores
CPU time first loop: 674 sec 1 client running at the same time Computer: MacBook Pro (Mid 2012) Don't update your system !!! El Capitain dramatically slows down the computer !!
Sat, 10/05/2013 - 10:40
#7
Intel Core Duo T2300 1.66GHz
CPU time first loop: 26.8 sec 1 client Computer: Vaio vgn-sz2M/B
Sat, 10/19/2013 - 08:45
#8
Intel Core i7-2600 CPU@3.40GHz 3.40GHz
CPU time first loop: 5,1 sec 2 clients Computer:
Sat, 11/16/2013 - 16:41
#9
can not join
1) Click on this contest: http://fold.it/portal/node/995975 closest "Link to join" is "join contest with magic key", which begets "wrong magic key". Not very helpful
Sun, 11/17/2013 - 12:00
#10
Oops Corrected! Here is the link to join
Sun, 11/17/2013 - 19:24
#11
Gateway DX 4300
59 loops, 10.275 sec/1st loop
Sat, 11/30/2013 - 15:17
#12
Intel Core i3-2350M CPU @ 2.30 GHz 2.30 GHz, Less Precise Wiggle
With less precise wiggle enabled, the result is as follows: Computer: Constructor: ICT Service desk Conclusion:: Less Precise Wiggle is about 30% faster and more rentable per unit of time on big proteins
Tue, 12/03/2013 - 21:29
#13
potential
Could this recipe work with other proteins?
Wed, 12/04/2013 - 17:32
#14
yes
For any own tests. (or you can create another contest - but 10 minutes might be to little for small puzzle and a powerfull computer - just edit the recipe then).
Tue, 12/03/2013 - 21:34
#15
Mac OS X 10.5.8
1st loop 18 seconds. 1 client iMac OS X 10.5.8
Tue, 12/03/2013 - 21:46
#16
Retest
10.87 seconds first loop The previous one was while working on the internet.
Sat, 02/01/2014 - 11:53
#17
Intel Core Duo T2300 1.66GHz -NewChapter Low (disable cut bands)
START SCORE IS LOWER With NC=> just compare loops and gain Intel Core Duo T2300 1.66GHz 1 client Computer: Vaio vgn-sz2M/B Conclusion: gain is higher in NC with Low & no cut bands
Sat, 02/01/2014 - 12:36
#18
Intel Core Duo T2300 1.66GHz -NewChapter Low (Enable cut bands)
ntel Core Duo T2300 1.66GHz -NewChapter Low (Enable cut bands) Intel Core Duo T2300 1.66GHz 1 client Computer: Vaio vgn-sz2M/B Conclusion: gain is higher in NC with Low & no cut bands
Sat, 02/01/2014 - 14:01
#19
Intel Core Duo T2300 1.66GHz -NewChapter MEDIUM
Intel Core Duo T2300 1.66GHz -NewChapter Low (Disable cut bands) START SCORE IS LOWER With NC=> just compare loops and gain Intel Core Duo T2300 1.66GHz 1 client Computer: Vaio vgn-sz2M/B Conclusion: gain is higher and faster in NC with Low & no cut bands
Sat, 02/01/2014 - 14:20
#20
Intel Core Duo T2300 1.66GHz -NewChapter HIGH
Intel Core Duo T2300 1.66GHz -NewChapter HIGH (Disable cut bands) START SCORE IS LOWER With NC=> just compare loops and gain Intel Core Duo T2300 1.66GHz 1 client Computer: Vaio vgn-sz2M/B Conclusion: Yield is higher with Lower & no cut bands
Sat, 10/04/2014 - 12:31
#21
Intel Core i3-3120M 2.50 GHz , Intel HD Graphics 4000, Windows 7
Cores: 4 "Windows performance" = 5.0 1) Heavy conditions Result: Score: 11329.335 2) Light conditions High Wiggle Power Result: Score: 11335.537 3) Light conditions Low Wiggle Power Result: Score: 11333.223
Sat, 06/20/2015 - 14:34
#22
iMac 3.4 GHz Intel Core i7
iMac 3.4 GHz Intel Core i7 (quad core) Heavy conditions Heavy conditions Will run again with just the test client open.
Sat, 10/17/2015 - 14:04
#23
Same test after update to El
Same test after update to El Capitan Running 4 clients Since conditions aren't identical to my original test I can't statistically presume El Capitan is faster but it "feels" faster.
Sat, 10/17/2015 - 14:31
#24
... and...LWP same conditions
... and...LWP same conditions result Score 9623.934 in 60 loops same result as AWP HWP same conditions result Score 9623.914 in 59 loops. Result: 11:32 sec/1st loop. Total gain 19.188
Fri, 02/17/2017 - 02:03
#25
result of test old dell window 7s i5 machine
ran "normal for me" condition, as one of two clients. ran auto wiggle power default, minimized the protein display to hydro, line and no stubs or sidechains, reduced size and pushed protein off screen |
|
It's not really a game. It only allows you to compare the power of your computer with best computers of other players. Some computers are good for Foldit, other poor. I noticed that Foldit recipe is very CPU resource consuming. I suppose that when a player buys a new computer, he will succeed gaining more points to this test.
1) Click on this contest: http://fold.it/portal/node/995975
2) Go to "Link to join"
Click on "Click here if you would like to join."
3) Open Foldit
4) In the main menu, click on "Contests" on the right pannel
You should see the Contests you joined, including this one. Select it and click on "play".
You'll get a very big protein.
5) Click here above right in order to load this recipe (or, in the recipe menu, type manually the number 46825 to manually load this recipe).
6) Run the recipe once.
7) Your score will rank your pc relative to my best pc I ever tested there
8) Open the right green button on the recipe in order to see the reciupe log. Here you can see some information, for example the CPU time of the first recipe loop. With a better PC, you'll see a lower CPU time there.
9) Save and share the result with yourself or your group for later archive. Whrite there the characteristics of your computer.
10) You might consider adding it here too. This could help people to select best PC adapted to Foldit ... and show that a powerfull PC is good for using recipes (it's less important for hand folding).