Contact Map all looks the same.

Case number:699969-997601
Opened by:Origami314
Opened on:Thursday, May 1, 2014 - 18:27
Last modified:Monday, November 12, 2018 - 07:01

The green squares on the predicted contact map all look like the same shade of bright green to me. I had no problem at all with the old periwinkle colors, but even changing my monitor settings is not giving me shades of green in the new map.

My system has:

Windows 7 64bit
Intel i5 processor
AMD Radeon HD 7900 graphics card
ASUS LCD monitor

(Thu, 05/01/2014 - 18:27  |  5 comments)

wisky's picture
User offline. Last seen 7 weeks 1 day ago. Offline
Joined: 07/13/2011

Some say the color changes are there, but subtle... However, I am not seeing any differences in coloring.

Joined: 02/23/2011

I fiddled with the colors a bit in Gimp and the above link goes to an image that should be usable for anyone else having this problem.

It's also colorblind friendly, I think. Can we have something like this color gradient for the real contact map?

Susume's picture
User offline. Last seen 3 hours 52 min ago. Offline
Joined: 10/02/2011

I agree that the difference in greens is too subtle - I can barely make out two different shades of brightness. I like origami's gold-tone map much better - the colors are easily distinguished from the grey and white background, but are also easy to distinguish from each other.

jflat06's picture
User offline. Last seen 16 hours 24 min ago. Offline
Joined: 09/29/2010
Groups: Window Group

I agree it can be hard to see. This is part of the reason I included the ability to see the actual weight of a contact by hovering over it.

I didn't want to expand out the range of colors to be too dark, since that can make it difficult to see the contacts in your current structure (the black dots).

I chose green because the human eye peaks in sensitivity around the green or yellow-green wavelengths. That said, it might be worthwhile to include a bit more yellow, or potentially interpolate between yellow and green in order to get the most out of that.


Developed by: UW Center for Game Science, UW Institute for Protein Design, Northeastern University, Vanderbilt University Meiler Lab, UC Davis
Supported by: DARPA, NSF, NIH, HHMI, Amazon, Microsoft, Adobe, RosettaCommons