Case number:699969-997474
Opened by:frood66
Opened on:Friday, April 11, 2014 - 22:14
Last modified:Sunday, April 13, 2014 - 10:35

For some time now we have been living with 2 ranking systems. Perhaps we can now just have one?

Whilst it is appreciated that this is not high on a list of priorities right now it simply seems daft to continue. Can we have one or the other?

Apart from anything else it is confusing for newbs and only detrimental from a gameplay point of view.

(Fri, 04/11/2014 - 22:14  |  4 comments)

Joined: 04/15/2012
Groups: Beta Folders

Two? Which are you taking about?

gitwut's picture
User offline. Last seen 3 years 19 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 05/18/2012
Groups: Contenders

Personally, I prefer the old scoring system. The new system, while nice because of the categories, fluctuates too wildly. Unless it can be made more stable, I think keeping both systems is better than dropping one or the other.

Joined: 09/21/2011
Groups: Void Crushers

I like both. Dont change.

spmm's picture
User offline. Last seen 8 weeks 1 day ago. Offline
Joined: 08/05/2010
Groups: Void Crushers

Agree with gitwut and Timo, to keep both, they do different things and show different timescales both are relevant to this game.


Developed by: UW Center for Game Science, UW Institute for Protein Design, Northeastern University, Vanderbilt University Meiler Lab, UC Davis
Supported by: DARPA, NSF, NIH, HHMI, Amazon, Microsoft, Adobe, Boehringer Ingelheim, RosettaCommons