CASP10 results

Case number:699969-994216
Opened by:marie_s
Opened on:Friday, December 28, 2012 - 18:29
Last modified:Friday, December 28, 2012 - 20:32

I think many players will like to have a feedback on CAPs10 from the Baker laboratory.

My observations seeing the results posted by Casp10 and We Fold are mixed:
- Foldit had some good results on some puzzles and very good on some refinement puzzles,
- the best solution is not often the best score,
- foldit is not good on very little proteins

Can we share our point of view and questions in a scientist chat?

(Fri, 12/28/2012 - 18:29  |  1 comment)

Susume's picture
User offline. Last seen 1 day 13 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 10/02/2011

I would love to see a summary in the blog, where we could post questions, followed up with a scientist chat.

I'd also like to see more of the scatter plots like you published for TR663, showing how many foldit solutions improved on the starting server model(s).


Developed by: UW Center for Game Science, UW Institute for Protein Design, Northeastern University, Vanderbilt University Meiler Lab, UC Davis
Supported by: DARPA, NSF, NIH, HHMI, Amazon, Microsoft, Adobe, Boehringer Ingelheim, RosettaCommons