CASP10 results

Case number:699969-994216
Topic:General
Opened by:marie_s
Status:Open
Type:Suggestion
Opened on:Friday, December 28, 2012 - 18:29
Last modified:Friday, December 28, 2012 - 20:32

I think many players will like to have a feedback on CAPs10 from the Baker laboratory.

My observations seeing the results posted by Casp10 and We Fold are mixed:
- Foldit had some good results on some puzzles and very good on some refinement puzzles,
- the best solution is not often the best score,
- foldit is not good on very little proteins

Can we share our point of view and questions in a scientist chat?

(Fri, 12/28/2012 - 18:29  |  1 comment)


Susume's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 days 6 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 10/02/2011

I would love to see a summary in the blog, where we could post questions, followed up with a scientist chat.

I'd also like to see more of the scatter plots like you published for TR663, showing how many foldit solutions improved on the starting server model(s).

Sitemap

Developed by: UW Center for Game Science, UW Institute for Protein Design, Northeastern University, Vanderbilt University Meiler Lab, UC Davis
Supported by: DARPA, NSF, NIH, HHMI, Amazon, Microsoft, Adobe, RosettaCommons