Recent omission of Zhang 1 on 527
|Opened on:||Sunday, March 11, 2012 - 23:25|
|Last modified:||Monday, March 12, 2012 - 06:29|
I fully appreciate the omission of the structures that are to close together, what I don't understand is the need to change Structure 6 into Zhang 2, which would normally be structure 7.
As a result, I have to ask what is the purpose of the ' model ', ' zhang ', and ' quark ' nomenclatures if they can be arbitrarily removed and substituted on structures they normally would not be associated with.
What I'm really getting down to is why all the added nomenclature to begin when all we need is simply a structure # to use as a reference to which particular RESET of the puzzle we are working on.
The above in my opinion is extremely confusing, one being to much nomenclature, the other being nomenclature that is substituted when occasion affords itself.
I am now under the impression that quarks, models, and zhangs are arbitrary constructs used by the foldit admin staff in some fashion I can only guess at and I personally will not be wasting my time guessing, but I sure would like a lot less confusion, if that could be accomplished.