new function to implement ( for exposed ss)

Case number:699969-990201
Opened by:firejuggler
Opened on:Saturday, August 20, 2011 - 16:27
Last modified:Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 09:01

Following a discusion on the global channel, I suggest 2 new function, one, at least allready been asked.

a isHydrophobic(Boolean) and a SSisExposed(Boolean). Since the hydrophobic state and 'exposed' state are already determined (on the fly for exposed), there should not be much data manipulation.

Combine those 2 with a rebuild loop and you have a base idea for a script.

(Sat, 08/20/2011 - 16:27  |  2 comments)

Rav3n_pl's picture
User offline. Last seen 12 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 06/17/2010

It can be useful.
Maybe there is thershold for negative hidding score part that indicating that? ie <-20 is exposed, and >=-19 is not yet exposed.

Joined: 09/14/2008
Groups: Void Crushers

well, to find exposed i tried to combine the low hiding score, ishydrophobic and distance between said segment and other segment ( in rosetta, a segment is supposed to be exposed if it has less than 18 other co-segment in a range of less than 10 angstrom)

I tried to do this with my last script availlable here


Developed by: UW Center for Game Science, UW Institute for Protein Design, Northeastern University, Vanderbilt University Meiler Lab, UC Davis
Supported by: DARPA, NSF, NIH, HHMI, Amazon, Microsoft, Adobe, RosettaCommons