Has the validity of 'Foldit Alphafold' been scientifically examined ?
|Opened by:||Bletchley Park|
|Opened on:||Saturday, December 11, 2021 - 18:10|
|Last modified:||Tuesday, December 28, 2021 - 11:42|
Has there been a scientific challenge to the validity of predictions that are issued by 'Foldit Alphafold' ?
How can we be sure that the predictions this model gives are accurate representations of true chances for success ? We receive bad scores for designs that score well in Foldit's energy function, until now the standard measure in Rosetta. Does that mean that Rosetta is also wrong ?
If there is (going to be) a paper on this topic, please tell us. I would also imagine that Foldit players are credited as they contributed to the models that are used in 'Foldit Alphafold'.