puzzle picture
1714: Symmetric Trimer Design: 100 Residues
Status: Closed

Soloists



Need this puzzle? Log in to download.  

Comments

bkoep's picture
User offline. Last seen 5 hours 20 min ago. Offline
Joined: 11/15/2012
Groups: None
Objectives

Core Existence: Monomer (max +3000)
Ensures that at least 30 residues are buried in the core of the monomer unit.

Core Limit: Complex (max +500)
Checks that no more than 105 residues are buried in the symmetric complex, including the interface between monomer units.

SS Design (max +500)
Penalizes all CYS residues. Penalizes GLY, ALA residues in sheets. Penalizes GLY, ALA, SER, THR in helices.

Ideal Loops (max +500)
Penalizes any loop region that does not match one of the Building Blocks in the Blueprint tool. Use "Auto Structures" to see which regions of your protein count as loops.

Secondary Structure (max +500)
No more than 50% of residues may form helices. Extra helices are penalized at 10 points per residue.

frood66's picture
User offline. Last seen 4 hours 14 min ago. Offline
Joined: 09/20/2011
Groups: Marvin's bunch
cores

This is ridiculous - I create a monomer with really good core.......the monomers are miles apart.

then the complex core filter penalises me. Surely this is not how this puzzle should work?

bkoep's picture
User offline. Last seen 5 hours 20 min ago. Offline
Joined: 11/15/2012
Groups: None
You're too good!

You're right! Ideally, the complex limit should only come into effect for residues that are buried at the complex interface—residues that are buried in the monomer unit should be exempt from the complex limit.

Unfortunately, the Core Limit Objective is not quite set up to handle this, and we thought it would be sufficient to impose the limit on the entire complex. We did not expect for players to so easily find solutions with so many residues in the monomer core. I apologize for the issue, although I am impressed by your design skills (I hope your solution was Shared with Scientists!).

The "Core Limit" puzzles are part of an ongoing experiment to see if it's helpful to limit the number of nonpolar residues at the symmetric interface. If the pilot analysis looks good, then we'll probably update Foldit to handle this situation better. In the meantime, we'll try to be a little more conservative with the Core Limit thresholds!

frood66's picture
User offline. Last seen 4 hours 14 min ago. Offline
Joined: 09/20/2011
Groups: Marvin's bunch
cores

the more I play this - the worse it gets.

My monomer should have no limit for core score - but it is seeping over and penalising even B4 I put the monomer near it's counterparts.

This puzzle should be denigrated - and the software sorted B4 being reposted

grogar7's picture
User is online Online
Joined: 10/03/2011
same problem as frood66

My monomer subunits are not in contact, but I'm getting Core Limit: Complex penalties. Was this really intended?

bkoep's picture
User offline. Last seen 5 hours 20 min ago. Offline
Joined: 11/15/2012
Groups: None
Thanks for the feedback!

We apologize for the issue—we'll try to mitigate this in the future!

Please upload your solution using Share with Scientists! I'm very curious to see your design!

Get Started: Download
  Windows    OSX    Linux  
Windows
(7/8/10)
OSX
(10.7 or later)
Linux
(64-bit)

Are you new to Foldit? Click here.

Are you a student? Click here.

Are you an educator? Click here.
Search
Only search fold.it
Recommend Foldit
User login
Soloists
Evolvers
Groups
Topics
Top New Users
Sitemap

Developed by: UW Center for Game Science, UW Institute for Protein Design, Northeastern University, Vanderbilt University Meiler Lab, UC Davis
Supported by: DARPA, NSF, NIH, HHMI, Amazon, Microsoft, Adobe, RosettaCommons