Profile
Best ForComments
Tue, 05/25/2010 - 22:06
#2
Question
Why does it make a difference if a sidechain is frozen?
Tue, 06/08/2010 - 17:31
#3
Hint...
As moving of the sidechains can change the number of snap positions, I reccomend to change the the line: do_sidechain_snap(idx,r) to if r<=get_sidechain_snap_count(idx) then do_sidechain_snap(idx,r) end to prevent an error.
Sun, 06/13/2010 - 20:20
#4
Thanks for the suggestion
Thanks for the suggestion Crashguard but I believe this issue is already addressed through the use of the boolean variable improvement_made. (And if you didn't freeze the sidechain you'd always return to the starting position)
Mon, 06/14/2010 - 07:00
#5
So...
...the "bad argument" for snapping already doesn't occur anymore?
Thu, 06/17/2010 - 01:56
#6
I do see it occasionally on
I do see it occasionally on this script and have no idea why: suspect a possible bug in foldIt.
Mon, 09/06/2010 - 16:57
#7
Thanks crashguard303
Thanks Crashguard303, your suggestion worked. "r" is being used without being correctly bounds checked. I don't know why anyone would intentionally introduce a vulnerability into their code. |
|
This coprime stategy for getting a "random" segment-to-work-on order is interesting.