Sun, 08/31/2014 - 00:10
#2
Maybe
Might have fewer contacts in Foldit (don't know!), but that is well overshadowed by the gorgeous structure Zhang4 has.
Sun, 08/31/2014 - 20:56
#3
That's the case
By our methods, the TASSER model appeared to fit this set of contacts slightly better than the Zhang model. However, I agree that the Zhang model looks much more realistic. It might be interesting to run another puzzle with the Zhang model.
Mon, 09/01/2014 - 19:25
#4
bleh :)
Baker 5 and Quark 4 also produced high contact scores which competed with Zhang for realistic modeling (in my opinion, I am no scientist [yet]). Would love to see all of them available for fixing up :)
I'm really not sure why you guys picked the tasser1 model over the Zhang4 model. Zhang4 has more contacts made and a less "messy" structure overall. Oh well.