510b naming convention is flawed
| Case number: | 699969-991747 |
| Topic: | General |
| Opened by: | smilingone |
| Status: | Closed |
| Assigned: | beta_helix |
| Priority: | 2 |
| Type: | Suggestion |
| Opened on: | Saturday, February 4, 2012 - 04:18 |
| Last modified: | Thursday, July 19, 2012 - 11:47 |
When reseting the puzzle it flashes model number, but, when looking at name on alignment tool it uses baker #
That little flaw may cause some issues down the road.
![](http://128.95.1.228:8000/tracking_pixel.gif?events=scAdd&f=1111&wdata={"x":12, "y":11}){kind=tracking}
sorry about that, the model number indeed corresponds to the baker number.
ie model3 is the same RosettaServer prediction as baker3
Hopefully there is no need to repost this one as 510c over this.
We'll try to be more careful next time.