puzzle picture
1873: Symmetric Trimer Design: Limited Interface
Status: Closed


Name: 1873: Symmetric Trimer Design: Limited Interface
Status: Closed
Created: 08/05/2020
Points: 100
Expired: 08/12/2020 - 23:00
Difficulty: Intermediate
Description: Design a symmetric protein trimer, with 3 identical chains that assemble together! This puzzle has no H-Bond Network objective, but there is "Core Limit: Complex" objective meant to limit the size of the interface between symmetric chains. An interface that is too large, with too many orange hydrophobics, can prevent the individual subunits from folding properly. The "Core Limit: Complex" objective will incur penalties if there are too many buried residues in the total assembly. This puzzle uses the Buried Unsats Objective, with a large penalty for buried polar atoms that can't make H-bonds. See the puzzle comments for more Objective details.
Categories: Design, Overall, Symmetry

Top Groups

1Go Science17,686100
3Anthropic Dreams17,61649
4Beta Folders17,13833
5Void Crushers17,08922

Top Evolvers

Top Soloists

1ZeroLeak7 67 97 Go Science17,686100
2Joanna_H 67 602 Gargleblasters17,65297
3grogar7 31 2 Anthropic Dreams17,61693
4Phyx 36 29 Go Science17,56389
5dcrwheeler 67 6  17,39385

Need this puzzle? Log in to download.  


bkoep's picture
User offline. Last seen 1 day 22 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 11/15/2012
Groups: Foldit Staff

Buried Unsats (max +500)
Penalizes polar atoms that cannot make hydrogen bonds, -150 points per atom (not including symmetric copies).

Core Existence: Monomer (max +1600)
Ensures that at least 16 residues are buried in the core of the monomer unit.

Core Limit: Complex (max +500)
Checks that no more than 60 residues are buried in the symmetric complex, including the interface between monomer units.

SS Design (max +500)
Penalizes all CYS residues. Penalizes GLY, ALA residues in sheets. Penalizes GLY, ALA, SER, THR in helices.

Ideal Loops (max +500)
Penalizes any loop region that does not match one of the Building Blocks in the Blueprint tool. Use "Auto Structures" to see which regions of your protein count as loops.

Joined: 12/06/2008
Groups: Contenders
Also wondering: why no cysteines?

One would think that having disulfide bridges would help stabilize and strengthen the three-dimensional structure of a designed protein.

You've explained before why (for the moment) no alanines in helices. But why no cysteines at all?

bkoep's picture
User offline. Last seen 1 day 22 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 11/15/2012
Groups: Foldit Staff
Good point

You're right, a disulfide bridge within a single subunit might help to stabilize the folding of the subunit. But it could also confound folding by forming off-target bridges if the protein is prone to misfolding -- either within the subunit or between two separate copies of the subunit.

For this reason we tend to prefer disulfides for stabilizing proteins that can already fold up on their own (without disulfides), but only do so with marginal stability. Oddly, very few de novo protein designs fall into this category. Typically, a de novo design folds up and is very stable (so we don't need disulfides); or it fails to fold at all (so cysteines are likely to form off-target disulfides).

Cysteines also complicate the experiments we use for testing designs in the lab, if some designs require disulfide-forming conditions and others do not.

A final practical concern is that, if we wanted to design disulfide bridges into our proteins, we would like some way (an Objective) to discourage unpaired cysteines in the design. Foldit doesn't have a problem modeling disulfides and unpaired cysteines in the same design, but if we test this protein in disulfide-forming conditions, those unpaired cysteines will find some way to form a disulfide.

User login
Download links:
  Windows    OSX    Linux  
(10.12 or later)

Are you new to Foldit? Click here.

Are you a student? Click here.

Are you an educator? Click here.
Social Media

Only search fold.it
Other Games: Mozak
Recommend Foldit
Top New Users

Developed by: UW Center for Game Science, UW Institute for Protein Design, Northeastern University, Vanderbilt University Meiler Lab, UC Davis
Supported by: DARPA, NSF, NIH, HHMI, Amazon, Microsoft, Adobe, Boehringer Ingelheim, RosettaCommons