DEVPREV] Loop Remodeling

Case number:699969-2004325
Topic:General
Opened by:Mike Cassidy
Status:Open
Type:DevPrev Issue
Opened on:Saturday, October 14, 2017 - 00:20
Last modified:Monday, October 16, 2017 - 23:01

I have frozen twice. Also I can not move or so do anything to the ligrand; is that correct?

(Sat, 10/14/2017 - 00:20  |  7 comments)


Joined: 06/24/2008
Groups: Void Crushers

Now froze three times.

Susume's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 53 min ago. Offline
Joined: 10/02/2011

I'm not sure I see the point of having all the cutpoints if we can't make the loops shorter or longer. Add and delete segments are not allowed.

rmoretti's picture
User offline. Last seen 22 hours 23 min ago. Offline
Joined: 01/15/2010
Groups: None

The cutpoints are there such that backbone changes in the loops don't propagate to the fixed portion of the protein. (Without them a global wiggle could result in the fixed portion of the protein falling apart.)

Susume's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 53 min ago. Offline
Joined: 10/02/2011

I'm no chemist, but the bond counts in the ligand look weird to me. The 2 hexagons and one pentagon are drawn with all double bonds (in any of the cartoon or stick views), with the oxygen in the hexagon having 4 bonds and the carbons having 6 or 5. In the pentagon that is in a different plane from the hexagons, two of the carbons have only 3 bonds. The oxygen that is bonded to residue 131 seems to have a carbon hanging off it with no hydrogens, so that carbon appears to have only 1 bond - unless that is supposed to be an OH, in which case the H did not get painted white (and is strangely long).

I don't know if any of this affects playability - it just bothers me.

rmoretti's picture
User offline. Last seen 22 hours 23 min ago. Offline
Joined: 01/15/2010
Groups: None

As you might have guessed by now, this devprev puzzle was a preview of 1440: Aflatoxin Challenge: Round 1. The ligand is supposed to be aflatoxin B1.

You're correct that the display of the rings is off. The 5-member ring with the two carbons with just one hydrogen each should indeed have a double bond between those two carbons. The other rings have all double bonds because they're annotated as "aromatic", and Foldit represents aromatic bonds as double bonds. (Note that the 5-member ring on the other side, the one with the two carbons each with two oxygens, actually shouldn't be aromatic.)

None of this affects the puzzle play, though. The single/double/aromatic bond annotation here is purely for display. Everything that affects the scientific results (and puzzle scoring) is annotated correctly, as far as I can tell. (But you're right that it can be distracting.)

The oxygen bonded to 131 is a bit of an interesting case. That's actually not a carbon or hydrogen that's bound to it with a strangely long bond, but a calcium ion. This is part of the active site of the enzyme. The ligand being modeled isn't actually aflatoxin B1 proper, but a transition state model of the aflatoxin degradation reaction. The calcium is interacting with that oxygen and helping to stabilize the transition state for a reaction where water is breaking apart the aflatoxin molecule. So that helps explain the "strange" geometry there. (It's more a coordination bond than a single bond, but Foldit has limitations on how it can display bonds.)

Joined: 09/24/2012
Groups: Go Science

Everything ok with recipes that include very diverse functions.

rmoretti's picture
User offline. Last seen 22 hours 23 min ago. Offline
Joined: 01/15/2010
Groups: None

Not being able to move the ligand is deliberate. The hope is to design a protein which will bind the ligand in that particular geometry with respect to certain residues in the fixed portion of the protein.

Sitemap

Developed by: UW Center for Game Science, UW Institute for Protein Design, Northeastern University, Vanderbilt University Meiler Lab, UC Davis
Supported by: DARPA, NSF, NIH, HHMI, Microsoft, Adobe, RosettaCommons